These 9 smoke control technologies will be phased out and banned throughout the industry! The reason for elimination is
Time:
2024-08-20
The Ministry of Ecology and Environment has released the "National Pollution Prevention and Control Technical Guidance Catalogue (2024, Restricted and Eliminated)", which will restrict inefficient dust removal and desulfurization technologies and uncontrolled system treatment technologies, and eliminate 9 flue gas treatment technologies such as positive pressure reverse suction bag dust removal.
In order to better play the role of technical guidance and promote equipment updates and technological progress in the field of ecological environment, the Ministry of Ecology and Environment recently issued a letter soliciting opinions on the draft of the National Pollution Prevention and Control Technical Guidance Catalogue (2024, Restricted and Eliminated Categories).
It is reported that in addition to some VOCs control technologies, the "Technical Guidance List" also includes 9 flue gas treatment (flue gas dust removal, desulfurization, denitrification) technologies such as positive pressure reverse suction bag filter, water spray desulfurization, electron beam desulfurization, and activated coke process with missing key components or process units, which may be phased out.
National Pollution Prevention and Control Technical Guidance Catalogue (2024, Restricted and Eliminated Categories) (Draft for Comments)
1、 Restricted category
|
|
Technical name | Introduction to Process and Facilities | Reason for restriction |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Low dust removal efficiency; Generate secondary pollutants such as sewage and sludge, which are highly corrosive to systems and equipment. | Only applicable to: (1) washing and purification of flammable and explosive gases; (2) Dust removal of high humidity and dew prone flue gas; (3) Pre dust removal. | |
|
|
|
|
Low dust removal efficiency. | Only applicable for pre dust removal. | |
|
|
Fiberglass wet electrostatic precipitator (fog) |
|
Fiberglass materials are flammable and pose high safety risks. | Only applicable for gas purification and dust removal. | |
|
|
|
|
The dust removal efficiency is low, and the use of particulate matter alone makes it difficult to achieve stable and compliant emissions. | It cannot be used alone as a dust removal technology. | |
|
|
|
|
We cannot guarantee the continuous and stable effectiveness of governance. | Cannot be used for new and expanded flue gas desulfurization and denitrification devices in the entire industry. | |
|
|
|
|
No purification effect on non water soluble VOCs. | Only applicable for the treatment of water-soluble VOCs. | |
|
|
Combustion, condensation, adsorption desorption, and absorption VOCs treatment technologies without control systems or control systems that do not achieve automatic adjustment and control of key parameters |
|
We cannot guarantee the continuous and stable effectiveness of governance. | It cannot be used for the construction and expansion of VOCs treatment devices in the entire industry. |
Note: Restricted technologies refer to technologies that can only be used in certain fields and conditions. This type of technology has problems such as low processing efficiency, poor operational stability, difficulty in treating secondary pollution, and low technical and economic efficiency. However, it is applicable in certain fields and conditions, and there is no suitable alternative technology available, so its application scope needs to be limited.
2、 Elimination category
|
|
Technical name | Introduction to Process and Facilities | Reason for elimination | Not applicable scope |
|
|
|
This technology is a bag filter dust removal technique that uses positive pressure filtration and reverse suction to clean dust, without an exhaust pipe, and directly discharges. | Easy to form unorganized emissions, weak ash cleaning ability, inability to achieve continuous monitoring, and insufficient emptying height. | Industry wide flue gas dust removal. |
|
|
|
This technology uses water as an absorbent (without adding a desulfurizer) to absorb sulfur dioxide in the flue gas when in contact with it. | The absorption rate of sulfur dioxide by water is very low and unstable, and the absorbed sulfur dioxide is easily re precipitated due to the influence of flue gas temperature. | Industry wide flue gas desulfurization. |
|
|
|
This technology utilizes the plasma generated by an electron accelerator to oxidize sulfur oxides in flue gas, and the product reacts with the added ammonia gas to produce ammonium sulfate. |
|
Industry wide flue gas denitrification. |
|
|
The desulfurization technology of spraying desulfurizer in the flue | This technology directly sprays gaseous, liquid, or solid desulfurizers in the flue gas to absorb and remove sulfur oxides from the flue gas, without a dedicated reactor. | Low desulfurization efficiency, unable to ensure stable and compliant operation; The by-products are difficult to handle. | Industry wide flue gas denitrification. |
|
|
Wet desulfurization technology with missing key components or process units | Wet desulfurization technology without key components or process units such as pH meter, oxidation fan, desulfurization waste liquid and by-product treatment system installed, including: lime/limestone gypsum wet desulfurization without slurry density meter, dual alkali method without pH meter in desulfurization tower and regeneration tank, no by-product oxidation and extraction facilities outside the slurry circulation system, sodium alkali method without saturated wastewater treatment or by-product utilization device, ammonia desulfurization without evaporation crystallization recovery system, magnesium oxide method without magnesium oxide maturation system, magnesium sulfite oxidation system, evaporation crystallization system. | Unable to ensure stable and compliant operation, which can easily lead to the transfer and discharge of pollutants. | Industry wide flue gas denitrification. |
|
|
Active coke process with missing key components or process units | Not equipped with a by-product preparation system or desulfurization analysis heating flue gas, by-product preparation system sulfur-containing tail gas, etc., before returning to the treatment facility in the front flue; Activated coke facilities without a reducing agent supply system. | Unable to ensure stable and compliant operation, which can easily lead to the transfer and discharge of pollutants. | Industry wide flue gas desulfurization and denitrification. |
|
|
Technologies for desulfurization and denitrification that cannot evaluate the effectiveness of governance | The desulfurization and denitrification agent has unclear components and removal principles, making it impossible to verify and evaluate the pollutant removal effect through chemical agents or by-products. | It is difficult to accurately evaluate the desulfurization and denitrification effect and ensure stable and compliant operation. | Industry wide flue gas desulfurization and denitrification. |
|
|
Oxidation denitrification technology without absorption device | Oxidation (including the addition of oxidation aids) denitrification technology without denitrification by-product absorption and treatment equipment. | Easy to cause concealed emissions and transfer emissions. | Industry wide flue gas denitrification. |
|
|
Denitrification technology by spraying denitrification agents in the flue | This technology directly sprays denitrification agents in the flue gas to absorb and remove nitrogen oxides from the flue gas. | Low denitrification efficiency can easily lead to excessive ammonia escape concentration. | Industry wide flue gas denitrification. |
|
|
|
This technology utilizes photocatalysts such as titanium dioxide to activate and oxidize VOCs. | The photocatalytic reaction rate is slow and the products are unknown. When applied to VOCs treatment, the treatment efficiency is low and cannot meet the treatment requirements. | Organized VOCs emission control. |
|
|
|
This technology utilizes active species generated by gas molecules under the action of an electric field, including excited state molecules, electrons, ions, atoms, and free radicals, to degrade organic pollutant molecules in exhaust gas. | Most volatile organic compound molecules undergo incomplete degradation and mineralization in low-temperature plasma fields; At present, low-temperature plasma purification facilities generally have insufficient installed power, insufficient reaction time, and low processing efficiency; The decomposition products are unknown, and secondary pollutants such as ozone and nitrogen oxides are produced as by-products. | Industry wide VOCs control (excluding odor control). |
|
|
|
This technology utilizes pollutant molecules to absorb short wavelength ultraviolet light, causing chemical bond breakage of pollutant molecules. At the same time, oxygen or water molecules in the exhaust gas absorb short wavelength ultraviolet light, producing active species including ozone and hydroxyl radicals that degrade and react with pollutant molecules. | The photoelectric conversion efficiency of photooxidation is low, and the effective radiation energy of the reaction device is generally insufficient; When applied to industrial waste gas treatment, the treatment efficiency is low; The reaction product is unknown. | Industry wide VOCs control (excluding odor control). |
|
|
|
This technology uses a honeycomb shaped activated carbon adsorption device to adsorb and purify VOCs, without an in-situ activated carbon regeneration system. | Saturated activated carbon is directly disposed of as hazardous waste. Honeycomb shaped activated carbon has low adsorption capacity and short effective use time, requiring frequent replacement; Honeycomb shaped activated carbon has low strength, is easily damaged, can be used once, and is difficult to regenerate and utilize in different locations. |
VOCs management across the entire industry. |
Note: Elimination technologies refer to technologies that are not usable in any field or under any conditions. This type of technology has problems such as unclear mechanisms, low processing efficiency, poor operational stability, uncontrollable secondary pollution, high material and energy consumption, and prominent safety issues. There are already more advanced alternative technologies that should be eliminated.
Related News
Wechat Public
Account
Hotline
Hotline
Follow
The Public
Follow Us
- Back